Imagine that Study shows that thinking about eating can reduce food consumption
Research by Carnegie Mellon University shows that thinking about food can reduce appetite (Photo: Pille Nami-Nami). Good news for diners everywhere – don’t try to think of a treat because the urge to eat it can lower your appetite! New research from Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) confirms the acceptance that thinking about food can lead to hunger. Studies show that simply thinking about diet causes people to lose their appetite. In one of five experiments, three groups of participants considered 33 repetitions; insert 33 sections into the washing machine; Insert 30 months and take our M & M’s, and releases quarterly and eats 33 M & M’s. Participants were allowed to eat free from the bowl of M & M’s and it was found that participants who considered eating 30 M & M’s ate less of M & M’s than participants. that can not. The follow-up was repeated tasks with different numbers of repeats and found similar results, but it was found that only considering the actual use of reduced consumption, It’s not just about food.
“Behavior is one of the most important factors in determining how much we consume a food or product when to stop using it, and when to switch to another diet. food or product marketing, ”said Joachim Vosgerau, assistant professor of economics at CMU. Tepper School of Business. “Our findings show that behavior is not only governed by a good understanding of sight, smell, sound, and touch, but also through the use of diet. mental differences. The difference between thinking and experience will be smaller than previously thought. ”
“These findings suggest that attempting to eliminate a perception of the need for food in order to obtain that food is fundamentally illegal,” said Carey Morewedge, director of the study. This research, and the assistant professor on health and decision making. “Our research shows that, on the other hand, people who consider the need for a diet – such as M&M or a cube of cheese – eat less of that food than those who do not.” Think about eating a few meals a day or making a difference but we think these findings could help improve future impacts by reducing cravings for things like unhealthy foods, medications, and smoking, and hopefully, they will help us learn how to help people choose healthy foods.
Dietary considerations are a way of expanding your self-esteem into a special diet that, when repeated 30 times, has been shown to reduce eating habits. The process relies on the memory process as a guide when behaving and encourages responses to a reduced motivation after it is repeated. Thus, rethinking the diet makes it particularly beneficial for the diet. Large numbers of reflections are laborious and time-consuming and can be problematic when requested in conjunction with the goal of reducing food intake. In the present study, we examined the efficiency of the process of small numbers of repetitions when trying to measure the motor according to the individual’s ability to easily use-reducing effect. 147 participants considered eating chocolate pudding 15 or 3 times in a row and completing a supportive or non-supportive diet. The results showed that participants who ate 15 servings of chocolate pudding (M15 = 178.20, SD15 = 68.08) consumed more pudding than those who consumed it 3 times (M3). = 150.73, SD3 = 73.31).
The nature of the motor movement that was performed did not affect these results. Data show that thinking about dietary patterns can lead to increased expectations in the diet when there are small numbers of repetitive thoughts. This need is addressed. further illustrated by the fact that the application process can be complicated when using higher numbers of reflection considerations. Morewedge et al. For example, (2010), ask participants to reconsider eating 33 or 30 meals. Participating in multiple repetitions requires a lot of time and a high level of motivation and self-control and it can be expected that a difficult application of the job will lead to reduced compliance and thus the purpose of interference. Indeed, previous research has shown that having self-regulatory resources is necessary for reducing dietary intake by rethinking results (Missbach et al., 2014, Study). 2).
The aim of the present study is to examine the effectiveness of re-thinking practices using mathematical concepts that can be included in the impact. While most studies use more than 30 repetitions, there are indications that thought culture can function effectively at a lower rate. For example, the study of Missbach et al. (2014, Lesson 2) Completed 18 repetitions. However, the same study found that the benefits of the number of repetitions were limited, and did not occur to participants. In fact, it seems that a small number of recovery cases can occur that result in reduced lifestyle or increased diet. Therefore, we tested whether the physical experiment could improve the utilization-reduction results of more in-depth use of less repetition.
One hundred and fifty-nine students from the University of Vienna can volunteer to participate in a trial exchange in exchange for credits or have the opportunity to win 5 EUR in the lottery. We are looking for participants in media and bulletins at the University. Participants were asked to refrain from eating and drinking 2 h before the experiment and believed that they participated in the tasting experiment. We included 12 participants by reviewing data for the first indication of anorexia – chocolate pudding – in a study or no response to a “favorite” measure. (8), because of dislike of food during the “taste test” operation (2), because of not answering online questions that contain change control measures (1), and because a person Participate in explanations to eat less in the “taste test” works more than needed, for fear of allergic reactions. The final sample included 147 participants (115 females) with an average age of 24.37 years (SD = 5.14).